The current state of forestry requires a change in the approach to assessing forests in terms of their level of ecosystem service (ES) provision. It is also necessary to have knowledge of the impacts of applying management models with varying degrees of alternation on the level of service provision. The main aim of the thesis is to quantify the level of provision in their whole scale by creating a new methodology of quantification and to determine the methods of calculation. Over experimental area to verify the impacts of defined management models on the level of ES provision. The thesis deals with several approaches to ES classification and possibilities of their indication. Concepts of forest management development have been developed, including close-to-nature management, the concept including the entire area into non-intervention state and, among others, the concept of the current development of forest management using current management models. The types of forest owners have been identified and their preferences as well for the purposes of indicating levels of provision of individual ES groups, and the degree of satisfaction of their needs has been assessed. The concept of current management showed the best degree of satisfaction of the needs of all defined types of owners. The concept of a multifunctional forest management and the “no management” concept (except the materially oriented owner) were at the same level. Other concepts showed lower levels of satisfaction defined by forest owners. In conclusion, we discuss the weaknesses and strengths of the proposed methodology and identifies the local specifics needed to carry out in the assessments and summarizes the possibilities of further research and development trajectories in the field.