DDP - Zverejnená diplomová práca

Sémantický diferenciál ako metóda hodnotenia estetických vlastností vybraných domácich drevín.

Autor
Febenová, Nikola
Školiteľ
Drličková, Eva
Oponent
Kaputa, Vladislav
Škola
Technická univerzita vo Zvolene DF KMOSL (DF)
Rok odovzdania
2017
Počet strán
50- 60 strán.. s
Trvalý odkaz - CRZP
https://opac.crzp.sk/?fn=detailBiblioForm&sid=998D604438B59F55BB8355FC0D22
Primárny jazyk
slovenčina

Typ práce
Diplomová práca

Študijný odbor
6259 | odvetvové ekonomiky a manažment

Dátum zaslania práce do CRZP
29.04.2017

Dátum vytvorenia protokolu
29.04.2017

Dátum doručenia informácií o licenčnej zmluve
17.08.2020

Práca je zverejniteľná od
ihneď

Elektronická verzia
 Prehliadať
FEBENOVÁ, NIKOLA: Semantic differential as a method for the evaluation of aesthetic features of chosen domestic wood species [Diploma thesis] - Technical University in Zvolene, Department of Marketing, Trade and World Forestry. Diploma thesis supervisor: doc. Ing. Eva Drličková, PhD.. Degree of academic qualification: Engineer, abbreviated „Ing.". Zvolen: TU, 2017. 80 p.A goal of this diploma thesis lies in the evaluation of aesthetic features of domestic wood species like oak, maple, walnut and beech. They are not surface finished. We have used the method of experimental questioning on the chosen sample of respondents. There is used semantic differential in 7 pointed scale and interior wood samples in experimental questionnaires. Target group of respondents contains 55 students from MSc study branch EMPZ, Technical University, Zvolen who were questioning in January 2017. We have defined limits for the wood species classification to the point 1 or to the point 7 in the pairs of adjectives. Results of experimental questioning were evaluated according to absolute and relative frequency, arithmetic mean. From the results we can see that oak is evaluated like comfortable, maple is bright, one-coloured, comfortable with smooth surface, walnut is interesting, dark with mat effect, beech is bright, one-coloured with smooth surface. Style of housing has no impact on respondents opinions. For the future, it will be better to decrease amount of evaluated wood species because evaluation of 4 wood species was difficult on psychics, observation and concentration of respondents.

Verzia systému: 6.2.61.5 z 31.03.2023 (od SVOP)